BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> M'Rorie v Hunter and Company. [1775] 5 Brn 548 (19 December 1776) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1775/Brn050548-0616.html |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by ALEXANDER TAIT, CLERK OF SESSION, one of the reporters for the faculty.
Subject_2 PRISONER.
Date: M'Rorie
v.
Hunter and Company
19 December 1776 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
M'Rorie, merchant in Maybole, being incarcerated by Hunter and Company at Ayr, presented a bill of suspension and liberation. His reasons of suspension were two:—1mo, That his effects had been sequestrated in terms of the late statute, and that he had, in consequence thereof, disponed his whole effects to the factor for his creditors; 2do, Had he even funds to pay this debt, it would not avail the creditor, as the factor would oblige the creditor
to repeat the payment. Lord Ankerville and Lord Covington, 6th November 1776, refused the bill, and this day, 21st November 1776, the Lords refused a reclaiming bill and adhered. 5th December 1776, refused a second bill.
The Lords had past two such bills formerly; one in the case of Cuthbert Gordon, merchant in Leith, and another at the instance of John Aird.
And this day, upon presenting a third petition, with a minute of his creditors, that his liberation was highly expedient for ingathering his effects, and there being no opposition, the Lords remitted to the Ordinary on the Bills to pass the bill.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting