BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Messrs Cross and Bogle v John Mure, Factor on the Estate of D. Lock. [1775] Hailes 615 (21 February 1775)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1775/Hailes020615-0357.html
Cite as: [1775] Hailes 615

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1775] Hailes 615      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR DAVID DALRYMPLE, LORD HAILES.
Subject_2 ARRESTMENT.
Subject_3 Used in the hands of a judicial factor, appointed in consequence of a sequestration awarded pending a process of cessio, and prior to the Bankrupt Act, 1772, if effectual.

Messrs Cross and Bogle
v.
John Mure, Factor on the Estate of D Lock.

Date: 21 February 1775

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

[Fac. Col. VII. 41; Dict. 757.]

Monboddo. A factor who is not removable by the debtor, is not in the common case: he is just in the situation of a curator, whereas an ordinary factor is no more than the servant of his constituent.

Hailes. If you hold it necessary that arrestment shall be used in the hands of the bankrupt, not in the hands of the factor, on the subjects of the bankrupt, the only consequence will be involuntary breach of arrestment.

Coalston. By the late Act of Parliament, the estate is vested in the factor; but that is not the case here. The factor is not vested in the estate; he is only an administrator. I am at a loss to distinguish this factor from any other factor.

President. The factor is in the legal possession of the goods by authority of the Court. In the case of Lockwood, the Lords sustained an arrestment in the hands of the clerk of Court for consigned money.

Kaimes. I arrest in the hands of a debtor, to hinder him to pay to the common debtor. To what purpose is it to arrest in the hands of the bankrupt who cannot pay, rather than in the hands of the factor who can? By the late statute, the factor is vested, in truth and in words, a factor, like the present one in truth, though not in words.

On the 21st February 1775, “The Lords sustained the arrestment in the factor's hands;” adhering to Lord Pitfour's interlocutor.

Act. A. Abercromby. Alt. G. Ferguson.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1775/Hailes020615-0357.html