BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Heritors of the Parish of Eccles v The Earl of Marchmont and Others [1776] Hailes 734 (14 December 1776) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1776/Hailes020734-0435.html Cite as: [1776] Hailes 734 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1776] Hailes 734
Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION, reported by SIR DAVID DALRYMPLE, LORD HAILES.
Subject_2 KIRK.
Subject_3 Division of a Kirk. Area, after being seated, how to be divided.
Date: Heritors of the Parish of Eccles
v.
The Earl of Marchmont and Others
14 December 1776 Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
[Faculty Collection, VII. 336; Dictionary, 7924, and App. —.]
Hailes. If this interlocutor were to be altered, a greater confusion would ensue than if all the churches in Scotland were to be settled by popular elections. The plan of the petition is, that the inhabitants of a parish are to have seats at random and indiscriminately, so that he who comes first to the church will have his choice: this might have done very well in former times when the area of the church was left void, and people brought their stools with them, which they threw at the minister if they did not like his doctrine; but it will not do in our age,—there is no necessity for a particular law in order to divide the seats in churches. Good'order requires a division, and no better rule can be devised than that which practice has adopted, that of dividing by the valued rent: this may be attended with inconveniencies, as every human institution is; but it is surely better than that of putting the churches in Scotland in the state of the commonties of royal burghs, which cannot be divided.
Braxfield. Altogether of the same opinion. In a parish where there is a burgh and a landwart parish, a different rule must, from necessity, be observed, and an area equal to the wants of the burgh must be set aside.
Kaimes. In cases like this, there can be no rule but the valued rent.
President. I have no notion that any other rule can be followed: many decisions of the Court have proceeded on the opinion that this was law. In the case of The Parish of Bathgate, the Court found that Lord Torphichen, as patron, was entitled to the first choice.
On the 14th December 1776, “The Lords found, that the division of the church must be according to the valued rent;” adhering to Lord Kennet's interlocutor.
Act. A. Crosbie. Alt. H. Dundas.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting
