BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Elizabeth and Janet Dicksons, v George Trotter. [1776] Mor 873 (18 January 1776) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1776/Mor0200873-075.html Cite as: [1776] Mor 873 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1776] Mor 873
Subject_1 ASSIGNATION.
Subject_2 Intimation by what equivalents suppliable.
Date: Elizabeth and Janet Dicksons,
v.
George Trotter
18 January 1776
Case No.No 75.
The debtor's private knowledge is not equivalent to an intimation, nor is parole evidence competent for proving such knowledge.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lord Ordinary having assoilzied the debtor, in a bond that was assigned, from an action brought at the instance of the assignee, the pursuer reclaimed, and prayed the Court either to find the defender, in respect of his being, in the knowledge of the assignation to the pursuer, liable in the contents of the bond; or, at least, to allow a proof of that knowledge by the oaths of two persons named.
The Lords ‘adhered to the Lord Ordinary's judgment.’
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting