BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Decree being given against a messenger and his cautioner for payment of a debt in a diligence which the former had repeatedly delayed to execute, notwithstanding of peremptory orders from his employer, it was urged in a suspension for the cautioner, that the creditor could qualify no damage, as the debtor remained still solvent. Answered, There is no necessity to qualify actual damage, it is enough that the messenger has not done his duty, which, if he had done, the debt, in all probability would have been paid. Another reason of suspension was, that the diligence was in the name of a company which was dissolved before it was issued, therefore there was no proper warrant. Answered, This is a matter that does not fall under the cognizance of a messenger, who must execute every diligence that is ex facie formal. The Lords found the letters orderly proceeded on. See Appendix.
