BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Sir James Grant, &C. v Duke of Gordon. [1777] 5 Brn 447 (00 January 1777)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1777/Brn050447-0432.html

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


[1777] 5 Brn 447      

Subject_1 DECISIONS of the LORDS OF COUNCIL AND SESSION. reported by Alexander Tait, Clerk Of Session, One Of The Reporters For The Faculty.
Subject_2 FISHING.

Sir James Grant, &C
v.
Duke of Gordon

1777. January

Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy

In a process for regulating the Duke of Gordon's cruives upon Spey, in the dispute betwixt his Grace and Sir James Grant, &c.; the Lords found that the rings of the hecks of the Duke's cruives behoved to be formed either in a round or oval shape: and if in an oval, That the longest axis of the oval behoved to be set in the line of the stream, and be placed at three inches from each other, and made only as strong as was sufficient to resist the force of the water. All this was to facilitate the passage of the fish, and in favours of the superior heritors. They found also, that the inscales behoved to be placed at the extremities of the cruive box, and to afford an entry into the cruives equal in wideness to the side of the cruive box next the sea: that they behoved to be taken out during the Saturday's slap, except in time of flood, when that could not be got done; but that, at that time, they should be fixed back to the sides of the cruive box: that the cruives should be placed on the bottom or channel of the river, and that the face of the cruive box should not project beyond the cruive dyke. And the Lords appointed these and certain other regulations to be observed by the Duke in placing and constructing his cruives, and to be completed before beginning of the fishing season, under the penalty of £50 over and above performance; and so to be continued under the like penalty to be paid by the Duke, his heirs, and successors, transgressing or opposing them, toties quoties, to such of the respondents, or their heirs or successors, who should sue for the same.

The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting     


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1777/Brn050447-0432.html