BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Messrs Cunningham, Dougal, and Company, v William Marshall. [1780] Mor 13313 (23 December 1780)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1780/Mor3113313-003.html Cite as:
[1780] Mor 13313
Messrs Cunningham, Dougal, and Company, v. William Marshall
Date: 23 December 1780 Case No. No 3.
Title to bring the action of ranking and sale.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Messrs Cunningham, Dougal, and Company, being creditors to Mr Marshall, by an heritable bond and infeftment, brought a process of ranking and sale against Mr Marshall, which coming to be called before the Lord Ordinary in the Outer-house, the pursuers craved the common interloctor, allowing a proof of the libel, &c.
Objected for Mr Marshall; A ranking and sale is a process of a most serious nature, and of all others the most important to the defender. The direct tendency of the action is to strip him of his whole fortune, and declare him to all the world a notorous bankrupt; and this must be the consequence of pronouncing the interlocutor insisted for by the pursuers, by which a publication of the defender's bankruptcy must be made in the newspapers, and diligence granted for recovering the title-deeds of his estates. By the act 1681, cap. 17, no such action can proceed, unless the debtor's affairs be manifestly desperate, his estate affected by diligence, and the creditors in the actual possession of the same. But in this case, there is no bankruptcy, no diligence against the estate by adjudication, nor is any creditor in possession, and, therefore, no action of ranking and sale can proceed; as appears from the stile of the summons, which in this, and every such action, libels, that the creditors are in possession of the estate.
Answered for the pursuers; The summons proceeds on an heritable bond and infeftment, as the pursuer's title; and subsumes, in the common stile, that the defender is bankrupt, and some of the creditors in possession; and concludes, that the creditors should be ranked, and the estate sold. In practice, it is understood, that when such an action is first called in the Outer-house, the powers of the Lord Ordinary are limited, and he can only judge, 1mo, of the pursuer's title; 2do, of the relevancy of the rebel; and, 3tio, if the debtor and his creditors are properly brought into Court. All other points, such as the bankruptcy; the creditors being in possession; the rental, value, and holding of the lands, are reserved for the cognizance of the Court. The Lord Ordinary is not entitled to inquire into these particulars. This was said to be agreeable to practice, and to the act of Parliament 1681.
The Lord Ordinary had repelled the objections, and appointed the sale to proceed in common form.
Mr Marshall gave in a petition to the Court, and this interlocutor was pronounced:
“The Lords having advised this petition, with the answers thereto, refuse the desire of the petition, and remit to the Lord Ordinary immediately to call the cause, and pronounce the act in common form.'
For Pursuers, William Craig, Ro. Blair.Alt. Ilay Campbell, Ro. Cullen.
Fol. Dic. v. 4. p. 207. Fac. Col. No 13. p. 23.
