BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Thomas Gemmil v Colonel John Walkinshaw-Crawford. [1782] Mor 7422 (20 February 1782)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1782/Mor1807422-137.html Cite as:
[1782] Mor 7422
An action of damages, founded on an acquittal in the Court of Justiciary, is not competent before the Court of Session.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Colonel Crawford having received certain anonymous threatening or incendiary letters, of which he suspected Gemmil to be the author, brought him to trial before the High Court of Justiciary. But Gemmil having been acquitted by his jury, he instituted, on that ground, an action of damages against Colonel Crawford; in support of which he insisted, that it was not competent to have entered any claim for damages in the criminal court.
The Lords were of opinion, That this claim was competent before the Court of Justiciary, and only there; as it would be a solecism, for the one Supreme Court to pronounce a judgment founded upon proceedings held in the other. It was further observed, that the claim's not having been entered there, betrayed such a consciousness of its being ill founded, as would have precluded the present action, though otherwise proper; in the same manner as if the demand had been actually made in that Court and rejected.
The Court therefore dismissed the action.
Lord Ordinary, Alva.Act. Geo. Fergusson.Alt. J. Boswell.Clerk, Menzies.
Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 346. Fac. Col. No 35. p. 56.
