BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> William Brown and Others v The Procurator-Fiscal of the Sheriff-Court of Edinburgh. [1783] Mor 7302 (19 March 1783) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1783/Mor1807302-013.html Cite as: [1783] Mor 7302 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1783] Mor 7302
Subject_1 JURISDICTION.
Subject_2 DIVISION I. Nature of Jurisdiction.
Subject_3 SECT. IV. What cases must be tried by an Inquest.
Date: William Brown and Others
v.
The Procurator-Fiscal of the Sheriff-Court of Edinburgh
19 March 1783
Case No.No 13.
Jury trial indispensable where the higher crimes are charged, tho' inferior punishments be libelled.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
William Brown and others were indicted before the Sheriff-depute of Edinburgh, for assaulting, wounding, and intending to murder certain persons in the streets of that city, and for masterful theft of some of their wearing apparel; the libel concluding for the same corporal punishment as those specified in the foregoing report. In this case, likewise, sentence was pronounced without the interposition of a jury, and the prisoners appealed to the High Court of Justiciary.
But here the Court, considering the crime charged to be of a higher nature than that which occurred in the former instance, though the punishments sought by the prosecutor in both were equal, unanimously determined, agreeably to the judgment pronounced on the case of Leonardo Piscatori, 17th January 1771, that the trial by jury was indispensable.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting