BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Sir William Dunbar v Sir James Sinclair. [1790] Mor 8867 (2 February 1790)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1790/Mor2108867-248.html Cite as:
[1790] Mor 8867
Subject_1 MEMBER of PARLIAMENT. Subject_2 DIVISION VI.
Summary Complaint to the Court of Session.
Subject_3 SECT. II.
Upon what grounds is a Complaint admitted.
Sir William Dunbar v. Sir James Sinclair
Date: 2 February 1790 Case No. No 248.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Sir William Dunbar and others gave in a summary complaint against a judgment of the freeholders of Caithness, for having refused to strike Sir James Sinclair off the roll, though he had succeeded to the peerage of Caithness. The Lords found the complaint competent, and allowed the complainers to bring proof of their allegation.
Fol. Dic. v. 3. p. 433. Fac. Col.
*** This case is No 108. p. 7395. voce Jurisdiction.
