BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
Earl of Kinnoul and Others, Petitioners. [1804] Mor 12191 (22 May 1804)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1804/Mor2912191-337.html Cite as:
[1804] Mor 12191
If, in the extract of a process for the purpose of appeal, the grand decerniture has been inserted, the Court, on the appeal being dismissed, cannot proceed to determine the rest of the cause, uuless it sees fit to recall the extract, to the effect of allowing the parties to proceed.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
On moving a petition to apply the judgment in the House of Lords, dismissing the appeal in the case of Earl of Kinnoul against Hunter, voce Salmon Fishing, a difficulty occurred, how far the Court could now proceed to determine the quantum of damages, notwithstanding of a reservation, to be heard upon that subject before the Lord Ordinary, contained in the interlocutor appealed from; for, in extracting the proceedings for the purpose of the appeal, the grand decerniture had been thrown in, as if it had been a final extract.
This difficulty was removed, by a deliverance recalling the extract of the decree in question, to the effect of allowing the parties to be heard on the question of damages, and granting warrant to and ordaining the keeper of the record to transmit the warrants of the extracted decree to the clerk of the process.
Lord Ordinary, Craig.Act. Solicitor-Gonorat Btair.Agent, J. Keay, W. S.Alt. H. Erskine.Agent, H. Davidson, W. S.Clerk, Home.
Fac. Col. No 162. p. 365.
*** It was found, (Douglas petitioner, March 7. 1753,) that informations must be engrossed in the extracted decree. The case is No 86. p. 12020.
