BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Graham, Petitioner. [1805] Mor 18_27 (27 February 1805) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1805/Mor18JURISDICTION-015.html Cite as: [1805] Mor 18_27 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1805] Mor 27
Subject_1 PART I. JURISDICTION.
Date: Graham, Petitioner
27 February 1805
Case No.No. 15.
Horning competent on the extracted decrees of the Magistrates of Burghs of Barony, if they have been made independent of their superior, prior to the jurisdiction act.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Thomas Oliver, merchant in Hawick, having refused payment of his accepted bill to John Graham, brewer there, a protest (2d Jan, 1805) was taken, and recorded in the Bailie-court books of Hawick. An extract of this protest, having a decree interponed by the Magistrates of that Burgh, together with their precept subjoined in common from, having been presented to the Clerk of the Bills, for letters of horning, a doubt occurred, how far such was competent.
The point was reported by the Lord Ordinary on the Bills.
Hawick is a Burgh of Barony, independent of the superior. Its privileges are enjoyed, in consequence of a charter of erection, by James Douglas of Drumlanrig, dated 11th October 1537, proceeding on the narrative, that the old charters and evidents had been lost and destroyed by the inroads of the English and thieves, in the bypast times of enmity and war, by which it appeared, that
his village of Hawick, lying within his Barony of Hawick, had been of old erected into a free Burgh of Barony. It was not pretended, that there was any usage in favour of the claim of Graham; but it had been once at least recognized by the Court in the case of this Burgh; Pears and James against Douglas, 2d July 1790, (not reported) as well as in the case of the Burgh of Paisley, 30th November 1790, No. 389. p. 7687.
The Court had no difficulty in authorising the Lord Ordinary to grant the horning, as craved.
Lord Ordinary, Justice-Clerk. For Petitioner, Walter Scott. Agents, Riddell & Gillon.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting