BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Ferrier v Berry [1835] CA 13_1081a (8 July 1835)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1835/013SS1081a.html
Cite as: [1835] CA 13_1081a

[New search] [Help]


SCOTTISH_Shaw_Court_of_Session

Page: 1081

Ferrier

v.

Berry
No. 335.

Court of Session

2d Division

July 8 1835

Moncreiff. T.

Charles Ferrier,     Pursuer.— Forsyth— Neaves. John Berry,     Defender.— D. F. Hope— Keay— Pyper.

Subject_Bankruptcy—Sequestration—Trustee—Penalty—Interest.—

The trustee on the estates of a company, and of the individual partners, having employed the proceeds of the individual estate of one of the partners in defraying the expenses of the management of the company estate—held not liable in penal interest as for retaining the funds in his own hands, under the 43d section of the bankrupt statute.

This was an action of count and reckoning raised in 1823 at the instance of Ferrier, trustee on the sequestrated estates of the Scotch Cooperage Company, and of the individual partners, against Berry, who had been the trustee originally elected, but had resigned in 1820. A remit had been made to an accountant, to whose report objections were lodged by both parties. The principal objections were on the part of Ferrier, and depended on whether Berry had, by the course of his conduct, subjected himself to the penalty of being refused credit for certain sums expended by him in managing the estate, and having his claim for commission disallowed. This part of the case, however, depended on special circumstances, which the Court considered not to be such as to warrant subjecting Berry to this responsibility.

Another point related to a claim to have Berry found liable in penal interest for certain proceeds of the individual estate of one of the partners, which had not been deposited by him in bank. It appeared, however, that these had not been retained in his own hands, but had been employed in defraying the expenses incurred in the management of the company estate, and that there were no creditors on the individual estate separate from the company creditors; and Berry contended that penal interest could only be imposed in respect of money retained by a trustee in his own hands, or applied to his own purposes.

The Court, taking the same view of the matter, on the report of the Lord Ordinary, repelled this with the other objections, and approved of the accountant's report.

Solicitors: H. Inolis and Donald, W.S.— M'Millan and Grant, W.S.—Agents.

SS 13 SS 1081 1835


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1835/013SS1081a.html