BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Anstruther v Anstruther [1838] CS 16_1132a (9 June 1838)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1838/016SS1132a.html
Cite as: [1838] CS 16_1132a

[New search] [Help]


SCOTTISH_Court_of_Session_Shaw

Page: 1132

016SS1132a

Anstruther

v.

Anstruther

No. 209

Court of Session

1st Division N

June 9 1838

Ld. Fullerton.

Lady Anstruther,     Pursuer.— Counsel:
M'Neill— Buchanan.
Robert Anstruther, and James Renton (Anstruther's Trustee),     Defenders.— Counsel:
Penney.

Subject_Poinding of the ground—Right in security.— Headnote:

A title was made up in the person of Major Robert Anstruther, as heir to his father in certain lands, which, in gremio, declared an annuity of £1000 by his father in favour of Lady Anstruther to be a real burden. Lady Anstruther raised an action concluding for decreet for letters of poinding of the ground for her annuity, against which Major Anstruther and James Ronton his trustee pleaded in defence, (1.) that her title was liable to an objection, as the title in his person was not regularly made up; (2.) that she should be viewed, in the circumstances, as already in possession, through the medium of a trustee, alleged to be hers; and (3.) that he had large counter-claims of accounting against her. Lady Anstruther answered (1.) that she stood infeft in a real right which was neither reduced nor challenged, and which the defender could not challenge without repudiating his own title; (2.) that the trustee was not her trustee at all; and (3.) that nothing was due under the alleged accounting, and, at any rate, that the arrears of a liquid debt, especially of the nature of an alimentary annuity, must be paid in the mean time, without abiding the issue of an action of accounting. The Lord Ordinary repelled the defences and decerned in terms of the libel with expenses; and the Court, on a reclaiming note, adhered with additional expenses.

Solicitors: Thomson Paul, W.S.— Roy and Wood, W.S.—Agents.

SS 16 SS 1132 1838


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1838/016SS1132a.html