BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Smith v Telford. [1838] CS 16_1223 (29 June 1838)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1838/016SS1223.html
Cite as: [1838] CS 16_1223

[New search] [Help]


SCOTTISH_Court_of_Session_Shaw

Page: 1223

016SS1223

Smith

v.

Telford.

No. 246.

Court of Session

1st Division

June 29 1838

Ld. Fullerton. B.

Alexander Smith and Others (Trustees of Thomson, senior),     Raisers.— Counsel:
D. F. Hope— More.
John Telford (Thomson, junior's Trustee),     Claimant.— Counsel:
Sol.-Gen. Rutherfurd— Christison.

Subject_Expenses—Trust.— Headnote:

In a multiplepoinding, the Lord Ordinary found the raisers, who were trustees under a family settlement, liable in the expenses of four branches of the discussion which had been maintained by them, but quoad ultra found them entitled to their expenses out of the fund in medio. In explanation of the judgment, his Lordship observed in a note, that “the Lord Ordinary is perfectly sensible that trustees are, in the general ease, entitled to be protected from all loss in the discharge of their duty, and that consequently any litigation fairly arising out of the peculiarities of the trust, or of the situation of the claimants on it, must generally fall on the fund of division—but there may be exceptions from this rule, as trustees may, from over-scrupulousness or obstinacy, engage in litigation, occasioning great and unnecessary expense which it would be unjust to impose on those holding the beneficial interest in the trust,—and in the present case the Lord Ordinary cannot acquit the trustees of such imputation. He has accordingly, and upon that ground, found the trustees liable in the preceding interlocutor.”

Both parties reclaimed on the point of expenses, but The Court refused both notes.

Solicitors: J. and J. N. Forman, W.S.— W.Renny, W.S.—Agents.

SS 16 SS 1223 1838


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1838/016SS1223.html