BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Finlayson [1838] CS 16_1270 (5 July 1838)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1838/016SS1270.html
Cite as: [1838] CS 16_1270

[New search] [Help]


SCOTTISH_Court_of_Session_Shaw

Page: 1270

016SS1270

Finlayson

No. 256.

Court of Session

2d Division. T.

July 5 1838

John Finlayson,     Petitioner.— Counsel:
Shand.

Subject_Heir cum beneficio.— Headnote:

Warrant granted, in peculiar circumstances, to record an inventory under the act 1695, c. 24, after the annus deliberandi had expired, reserving all objections to the competency.


Facts:

Finlayson presented a petition, stating that his sister-german, who resided in Ross-shire, had died 13th April, 1837, and he had, as her heir-apparent, made up and executed an inventory of her heritable estate, in terms of the act 1695, c. 24, on 22d March, 1838; that he had thereafter caused the same to be transmitted, for the purpose of being recorded, to the Sheriff-clerk of the county of Ross, whose depute had certiorated Finlayson's agent of the inventory having been recorded; that the agent, however, never received an extract of the registered inventory, but was informed by the Sheriff-clerk, on 4th May, 1838, that the inventory was not recorded, and that the original communication in regard to it must have been opened by the Sheriff-clerk-depute, who had since absconded under an accusation of forgery and other offences. Referring to certain cases, 1 where it had been rendered impossible for the heir to record an inventory within the time specified in the statute, and where the Court had authorized the inventory to be received and recorded, although the onus deliberandi had expired, the petitioner prayed for a warrant authorising the necessary public officers to receive another inventory, duly made up, and now produced, although more than a year had elapsed since the death of the predecessor.

_________________ Footnote _________________

1 Bell, May 28, 1830 (ante, VIII. 839, and cases there cited).

The Court granted warrant accordingly, “reserving all objections to the competency.”

Solicitors: W. Traquair, W.S.—Agent.

SS 16 SS 1270 1838


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1838/016SS1270.html