BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Pet. - Christina Fairgrieve, for Admission to Poor's Roll [1865] ScotLR 1_51_1 (2 December 1865)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1865/01SLR0051_1.html
Cite as: [1865] SLR 1_51_1, [1865] ScotLR 1_51_1

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 51

Court of Session Inner House First Division.

Saturday, Dec. 2. 1865

1 SLR 51_1

Pet.—Christina Fairgrieve, for Admission to Poor's Roll.

Subject_1Poor's Roll.

Facts:

A girl refused the benefit of the poor's roll to enable her to advocate an action of filiation and aliment which had been decided against her in the Sheriff Court.

Headnote:

The petitioner was pursuer of an action of filiation and aliment in the Sheriff Court of Haddington. which had been decided in her favour by the Sheriff-Substitute, and against her by the Sheriff-Depute. She proposed to advocate the Sheriff's judgment on juratory caution, and applied for the benefit of the poor's roll. A remit was made to the reporters, who certified that the applicant had a probabilis causa litigandi. The defender objected to the petitioner being admitted to the poor's roll. It was a case betwixt two farm servants, which had already been considered by two local Judges, and

Page: 52

the parties should not be encouraged to continue the litigation. Duncan v. Morrison, 16th January 1863 ( 1 Macph. 257), was in point. It was stated that the petitioner was twenty-two years of age and unmarried, had one child, earned elevenpence a day, and neither she nor her parents had any property of any description.

The Court refused the application.

Counsel:

Counsel for Petitioner— Mr C. T. Couper. Agent — Mr R. C. Bell, W.S.

Counsel for Defender— Mr Millar.

1865


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1865/01SLR0051_1.html