BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Lawson v. Ferguson [1866] ScotLR 2_69 (6 June 1866) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1866/02SLR0069.html Cite as: [1866] ScotLR 2_69, [1866] SLR 2_69 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 69↓
Jury Trial.
(Before
In a trial of an action for breach of promise of marriage, held (per Lord Kinloch) that a party could not ask a witness what he had been told by himself on a particular occasion.
In this case the following issue was sent to trial:—
“Whether, in or about the month of December 1865, the defender promised and engaged to marry the pursuer; and whether the defender has wrongfully failed to implement the said promise and engagement, to the loss, injury, and damage of the pursuer?”
Damages laid at £1000.
In the course of the evidence it was proposed by the counsel for the defender to ask one of his own witnesses what the defender had said to him on a particular occasion.
Millar for the pursuer ( Burnet with him) objected that the question was incompetent.
Gifford, for the defender ( Mair with him), urged that as the defender was not a competent witness in a breach of promise of marriage case, the evidence proposed should be allowed.
The jury, after an absence of three hours, returned a unanimous verdict for the pursuer; and by a majority of 9 to 3 assessed the damages at £50.
Solicitors: Agent for Pursuer— W. S. Stuart, S.S.C.
Agent for Defender— W. Officer, S.S.C.
