BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Accountant in Bankruptcy v. A. B [1867] ScotLR 5_121 (17 December 1867) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1867/05SLR0121.html Cite as: [1867] SLR 5_121, [1867] ScotLR 5_121 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 121↓
Bankruptcy — Report by Accountant in Bankruptcy.
On a report by Accountant in Bankruptcy, stating that a trustee on a sequestrated estate had contravened the 83d and other sections of the Bankruptcy Act 1856, and praying for censure of trustee, and finding against him of expenses, held (1) that by such contravention the trustee became bound to pay penal interest in terms of the Act; (2) that if such contravention did not arise from innocent causes, the Court were bound to remove the trustee, to find him not entitled to any remuneration, and to find him liable in expenses. In the circumstances of the case, expenses modified.
Held that a report by the Accountant in Bankruptcy under sec. 159 of Bankruptcy Act 1856, brings on the whole matter of the report to be dealt with by the Court, just as if a petition had been presented to the Court.
This was a report presented to the Court by the Accountant in Bankruptcy under sec. 159 of the Bankruptcy Act, 1856.
The report narrated sections 82, 83, 84, 125, 130, and 132 of the Act, and bore that the trustee had failed to lodge in bank a sum of money belonging to the bankrupt estate, and had falsely set forth in the accounts submitted by him from time to time to the Commissioners, that these sums were lying in bank to the credit of the estate. The report craved the Court to order intimation to the trustee, and thereafter to deal summarily with the matter, by censure or otherwise, and to find the trustee liable in expenses.
Answers were lodged for the trustee, admitting the general correctness of the report, and expressing his deep regret that the irregularities complained of had occurred. He explained that the balance due by him to the estate, together with
Page: 122↓
the whole bank interest which would have been due thereupon, had now, with the exception of a sum of £17, 14s. 4d., been accounted for. It was also explained that the trustee was now himself bankrupt, and quite unable to pay penal interest.
Lord Advocate ( Gordon) and Skelton for Accountant in Bankruptcy.
Brand for trustee.
After hearing counsel on the case, the Court desired information as to (1) whether penal interest had been paid; (2) whether the creditors wished the trustee to be retained or dismissed; (3), what had been done in previous cases; and continued the case.
The case was again called.
Lord Advocate ( Gordon) and Skelton explained that penal interest had not been paid. They cited M'Cubbin, 29th June 1861, 2 Macph.. 1293, and Ac countant in Bankruptcy v. A.B., 9th Dec., 1865, 1 Scottish Law Reporter, 67. They craved the Court to censure the trustee, and find him liable in expenses.
Trayner, for a creditor, who was also a commissioner on the estate, craved the Court to find that the trustee had contravened the 83d section of the Act; to remove him from office; to find him liable in expenses; and to order a meeting of creditors for appointing a new trustee.
Brand for trustee.
Lord President—My Lords, this case comes before us on a report by the Accountant in Bankruptcy under the 159th section of the statute, and it is necessary for us to consider, in the first instance, what we can do under that section. The report is to be made by the Accountant when he sees cause to make it, or finds that a trustee or Commissioners are not faithfully performing their duties, and duly observing all rules and regulations imposed on them by statute, Act of Sederunt, or otherwise, relative to the performance of those duties; or, in the event of any complaint being made to him by any creditor in regard thereto, he is to inquire into the same, and, if not satisfied with the explanation given, he is to report thereon to the Lord Ordinary in time of vacation, or, during time of session, to either Division of the Court of Session, who, after hearing such trustees or commissioners thereon, and investigating the whole matter, shall decide, and shall have power to censure such trustees or commissioners, or remove them from their office, or otherwise to deal with them as the justice of the case may require. (Sec. 159.) It appears to me that when anything of this kind is brought before us by report by the Accountant in Bankruptcy, we may do anything in the matter which we have power to do under the statute, even though under other circumstances we could only act on a petition or some other process; in short, that the report brings the whole matter up, and leaves us to deal with the matter. That being so, we come back to the charge made against this trustee under the 83d section of the Act—and it is a very serious charge—because the Accountant reports it to be, and I cannot help dealing with it as, a flagrant violation of a trustee's duty, very gross and long-continued, by means of which monies belonging to the bankrupt estate have been kept in the trustee's own hand instead of in bank, and it is not disputed by the trustee that this charge is in the main well founded. The first consequence of such a charge against a trustee is, that he becomes bound to pay interest to the creditors at the rate of 20 per cent. per annum on the excess of such sum above fifty pounds as he shall keep in his own hands more than ten days for such time as the same shall be in his hands beyond ten days. But then there is a farther provision which devolves a particular duty on the Court. It enacts that unless the money has been so kept out of bank from innocent causes, the trustee shall be dismissed from his office upon petition to the Lord Ordinary or Sheriff by any creditor, and have no claim to remuneration, and shall be liable in expenses. Now, the first thing to be determined is, whether the money has been kept out of bank from innocent causes, and I must say I don't see the slightest ground for thinking that it has. Then, is not the clause imperative? I think it is, and that it is binding on us under this clause to dismiss the trustee from his office; to find that he has no claim for remuneration; and to find him liable in expenses. It is almost an inevitable consequence of a trustee being in such circumstances liable to pay penal interest, and not having paid it, that he should be dismissed from office, because otherwise there would be no one to recover that penal interest for the creditors. But it is not necessary to go into that, because the provision of the statute is imperative. Our course is the same as if a petition for dismissal of the trustee had been presented. I would only suggest that perhaps in the circumstances of this case, as we have had more than one discussion on this report, there may be room for some modification of expenses.
Trayner moved for expenses of a single appearance.
The Court granted modified expenses.
The Court appointed a meeting of creditors for electing a new trustee.
Solicitors: Agent for Accountant in Bankruptcy— T. G. Murray, W.S., Crown-Agent.
Agent for Trustee— J. Y. Pullar, S.S.C.
Agents for Creditors— Campbell & Smith, S.S.C.
