BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Special Case - Roope and Ball [1872] ScotLR 9_341 (7 March 1872)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1872/09SLR0341.html
Cite as: [1872] SLR 9_341, [1872] ScotLR 9_341

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 341

Court of Session Inner House Second Division.

Thursday, March 7. 1872.

9 SLR 341

Special Case—Roope and Ball.

Subject_1Legacy
Subject_2Clause of Survivance
Subject_3Vesting.
Facts:

A. died leaving a trust-disposition to trustees, with directions that they should hold his whole means and estate for the liferent use of his wife, and on her death, after paying certain legacies, to pay over the residue among their nieces “equally among them and the survivor of them.” One of the nieces predeceased the widow. Held that her share had not vested in her, and could not be claimed by her representatives.

Headnote:

The late John Strang, LL.D., Chamberlain of the city of Glasgow, by his trust-disposition, dated 30th May 1863, and codicil, dated 5th December 1863, conveyed to the parties therein named the whole estate, heritable and moveable, which should belong to him at the time of his death, as trustees for the purposes therein written; and by the said codicil he made certain additional bequests, and gave some directions to his trustees. The truster, by the said trust-deed, directed his trustees to hold the whole residue of his means and estate, heritable and moveable, for the liferent use and behoof of his wife, Elizabeth Anderson, and to pay the whole free annual produce of said residue to her during her life; on the death of his wife to pay certain legacies; and, lastly, to pay and divide the residue of his whole means and estate to and among his three nieces, Elizabeth Machen or Roope, daughter of Mrs Ramsay Strang or Machen, his sister, and Mary and Elizabeth Knox, daughters of Mrs Isabella Strang or Knox, now deceased, also his sister, and that equally among them, and the survivors of them, share and share alike. Mrs Isabella Strang or Knox was the wife of Edmond Dalrymple Hesketh Knox.

Dr Strang died on 23d December 1863, survived by his wife and by Mrs Elizabeth Roope, Mary Knox, and Elizabeth Knox, who is now the wife of William Clare Ball. Mrs Strang enjoyed the liferent of the residue, and died on 9th August 1871, survived by Mrs Roope and by the said Elizabeth Knox, now Mrs Ball. Mary Knox died unmarried and intestate on 18th December 1868. Mary Knox's domicile at the time of her death was in Ireland, and, according to the law of that country, her father, the said Edmond Dalrymple Hesketh Knox, was entitled to her whole personal estate.

With reference to the foregoing facts, the parties respectively requested the opinion and judgment of the Court on the following question:—“Whether the said Mary Knox, at the time of her death, had a vested right and interest, to the extent of one-third, in the residue of the estate of the said Dr John Strang?”

The clause in the deed upon which the question principally turned was as follows:—“and Lastly, I direct said trustees to pay and divide the residue of my whole means and estate to and among my three nieces, Elizabeth Machen or Roope, daughter of the said Ramsay Strang or Machen, and Mary and Elizabeth Knox, daughters of the said Isabella Strang or Knox, and that equally among them and the survivors of them, share and share alike, but not subject to the jus mariti of any of their husbands, or to the debts or deeds or the diligence of the creditors of any of said husbands.”

Judgment:

Millar, Q.C., and Keir for Mrs Elizabeth Machen or Roope.

Watson, for Mr Ball, as administrator for the Rev. E. D. H. Knox.

The Court unanimously answered the question in the negative, being of opinion that the vesting was postponed until the death of the liferentrix, and that, as Mary Knox had predeceased before that event, her representatives could claim he share in the residue of Dr Strang.

Solicitors: Agents— John Auld, W.S., and Melville & Lindsay, W.S.

1872


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1872/09SLR0341.html