BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Special Case - George Weir Cosens and Mrs Irwin and Others [1873] ScotLR 10_526 (26 June 1873)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1873/10SLR0526.html
Cite as: [1873] ScotLR 10_526, [1873] SLR 10_526

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 526

Court of Session Inner House Second Division.

Thursday, June 26. 1873.

10 SLR 526

Special Case—George Weir Cosens and Mrs Irwin and Others.

Subject_1Contract of Marriage
Subject_2Alimentary Annuity
Subject_3Power to Discharge.
Facts:

Where the free rents of an estate burdened with an alimentary annuity in favour of A, the widow of the truster, were not sufficient to meet the annuity, an arrangement was entered into between the annuitant and the heir-atlaw of the truster, for an unconditional sale of the annuity.— Held that the annuitant had no power to discharge the annuity, and that the trustees were not entitled to carry the remainder of the estate to the heir-at-law.

Headnote:

The parties to this Special Case were—first, the brother and heir at law of the late Robert Cosens Weir of Bogangreen—and second, the widow and trustees acting under the trust-disposition and settlement of the said Robert Cosens Weir. It was presented under the following circumstances:—

Page: 527

By antenuptial contract of marriage, dated 16th June 1865, between the late Robert Cosens Weir of Bogangreen and the said Caroline Louisa Antoinette Irwin, the said Robert Cosens Weir bound himself, his heirs, executors, and representatives whomsoever, to make payment to the said Caroline Louisa Antoinette Irwin, his then promised spouse, in case she should survive him, yearly, and each year during all the days of her life after his decease, of a free liferent annuity of £300; further, he bound and obliged himself and his foresaids to make payment to her, in case she should survive him, and there should be no living child of the intended marriage, and no issue of such child, of an additional free liferent annuity of £100, payable in the same manner and subject to the like condition as the annuity of £300; and it was declared that the said annuities should be paid to the said Caroline Louisa Antoinette Irwin exclusive of the jus mariti of her husband, in case she should enter into a second marriage, and the receipts for the same to be granted by her alone should be valid and sufficient. The contract contained a declaration in the following terms, viz., “and said annuities are hereby declared alimentary, and it shall not be competent for the said Caroline Louisa Antoinette Irwin to sell, assign, or burden the same, and they shall not be affectable by the deeds or attachable for the debts of any husband to whom she may be married.” In security of the said annuities George Cosens Weir disponed by said contract to his said intended wife his lands and estate of Bogangreen, in the parish of Coldingham, in the county of Berwick. This marriage-contract was recorded in the Register of Sasines, &c., for Berwickshire, the 27th February 1868.

By trust-disposition and settlement, dated 12th May 1866, the said Robert Cosens Weir conveyed the said lands and estate of Bogangreen, and the lands of Alemill, as also his whole other estate, heritable and moveable, to the second parties hereto, other than the said Montagu Stevenson, as trustees for the purposes following, viz., first, to pay debts, &c.; second, to make payment to his said wife, in case she should survive him, during all the days of her life after his decease, of both the annuities of £300 and £100 settled upon her by their contract of marriage, and that, even although there should be a living child or children procreated of the marriage, or issue of such child or children, she should have a free liferent annuity of £400, which should be paid to her exclusive of the jus mariti of her husband in case she should enter into a second marriage, and the receipts for the same to be granted by her alone should be valid and sufficient to the receivers thereof. The trust-deed contained a declaration in the following terms, viz., “And said annuity is hereby declared alimentary, and it shall not be competent for my said wife to sell, assign, or burden the same, and it shall not be affectable by the deeds, or attachable for the debts, of any husband to whom she may be married.” The third, fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh purposes applied only in the case of children of the marriage being in existence; eighth, the trustees were directed, in case all the testator's children should predecease him, or, after surviving him, should predecease his said wife without leaving lawful issue, to pay, assign, and dispone the then free remainder of the moveable estate to his said wife, and her heirs, executors, and successors whomsoever, for their own absolute use and uncontrolled disposal, and to give to her during her life the free rents of the heritable estate; and lastly, the testator directed his trustees, on the death of his said wife and all his children without leaving lawful issue, to pay, assign, and dispone the then free remainder of the trust-estate, heritable and moveable, to his only brother, the said George Weir Cosens, the first party, and his heirs, executors, and successors whomsoever, for their own absolute use and uncontrolled disposal, and, failing him, then to his, the testator's nearest heir absolutely. This trust-disposition and settlement was recorded in the Division of the General Register of Sasines applicable to the county of Berwick, on the 14th October 1869.

Robert Cosens Weir died on 3d September 1867. There was no issue born of the marriage.

His widow entered into a second marriage with Montagu Stevenson, late captain in her Majesty's 30th Regiment of Foot, residing at Fairfield, by Bradford-on-Avon.

The moveable estate was exhausted in paying the debts of the truster, and there was thus no free moveable estate available for payment to Mrs Stevenson under the last purpose of the trust-deed. Since the death of Robert Cosens Weir his widow regularly received payment of the foresaid annuities, amounting together to £400, but the yearly income of the trust-estate is not sufficient to pay the same. There are no free rents available for payment to Mrs Stevenson under the last purpose of the trust-deed. The second parties are under the necessity of borrowing money from time to time on the security of the trust-estate, in order to enable them to pay said annuities. The income and fee of the estate were being rapidly diminished, and the result would be that in the course of a few years the estate would be exhausted and the annuities would cease.

In this state of matters the widow of Robert Cosens Weir (now Mrs Stevenson) and the said George Weir Cosens (the first party) informed the trustees (the second parties) that they had entered into an arrangement for the discharge by Mrs Stevenson of her right to the annuities in future in consideration of receiving from the said George Weir Cosens the sum of £4500.

The said George Weir Cosens required the trustees, the second parties, upon production and delivery of such discharge by Mrs Stevenson, to convey to him the remainder of the trust-estate still in their hands.

The following question of law was submitted for opinion of the Court:—

“Whether the said Mrs C. L. A. Irwin or Stevenson, with concurrence of her present husband, has power to discharge the provisions secured to her by the marriage-contract and trust-disposition and settlement above recited, and to disburden the lands of Bogangreen, &c., thereof; and whether, upon production and delivery of a discharge by her, with concurrence aforesaid, in favour of the trustees, the said trustees are entitled and bound to convey the remainder of the trust-estate to the said George Weir Cosens?”

Cases cited— Kippen, 10 Macph., 134; Tod's Trustees, 9 Macph., 738; Bell's Com., i. 129.

At advising—

Judgment:

Lord Justice-Clerk—I think the question should be answered in the negative. The cases of Tod's Trustees and Kippen have no application, for in both the trust was to come to an end on

Page: 528

payment of the annuity. Here, however, the fund is expressly declared to be alimentary, and a trust is provided to continue and carry out the purposes specified.

Lord Cowan—I concur. The cases of Tod and Kippen proceeded on grounds not applicable to this case. Here there is a specific annuity given by the marriage-contract, declared to be alimentary, and confirmed by the subsequent settlement. I do not think a husband stands in a different position from a father giving an alimentary annuity to his daughter. By the proposed sale the alimentary character of the annuity would be completely destroyed, no conditions of any sort are proposed to be adjected, but the money to be handed over to the annuitant. I am clear any discharge so given is not good so as to compel the trustees to denude. There are many ways by which the ultimate destruction of the annuity fund might be prevented, as, for instance, a ranking and sale, by which the true value of the estate would be realised, and an annuity bought and settled on the annuitant under limitations to be imposed by the Court.

Lord Benholme—I concur.

Lord Neaves—I concur. The element of alimentary provision has often been recognised, and is a substantial object for a parent or husband to look to.

The Court answered the queation in the negative.

Counsel:

Counsel for Heir-at-Law— Marshall. Agents— J. & J. Turnbull, W.S.

Counsel for Trustees— Lee. Agents— Tods, Murray, & Jamieson, W.S.

1873


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1873/10SLR0526.html