BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Kirk v. Kirk [1875] ScotLR 13_65 (12 November 1875) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1875/13SLR0065.html Cite as: [1875] SLR 13_65, [1875] ScotLR 13_65 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 65↓
A woman was divorced from her husband on the ground of infidelity, and three co-defenders were found liable in the expenses of the action. Against the interlocutor granting decree of divorce the woman reclaimed, but the Court refused the note without calling on the respondents' counsel. Held that the woman was not entitled to her expenses in regard to the reclaiming note, the same having been utterly without ground.
Counsel for Pursuer — Campbell. Agents— White-Millar, Allardice, Robson, & Innes, W.S.
Counsel for Defender — Mair. Agent— B. Menzies, S.S.C.