BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Ferguson v. M'Duff [1878] ScotLR 15_664_1 (2 July 1878) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1878/15SLR0664_1.html Cite as: [1878] ScotLR 15_664_1, [1878] SLR 15_664_1 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 664↓
[
Where, under the first section of the Act of Sederunt of November 2, 1872, an action had been dismissed in respect that no counsel attended on either side when the case was called in the Lord Ordinary's Procedure Roll, the Court, upon a reclaiming note, recalled the interlocutor in respect that there were on the Lord Ordinary's Roll of that day a proof, a Bill Chamber cause, and several debates, so that counsel might not have been able to ascertain when the case would be called, but intimated that it was not to be taken for granted that such a course would be followed in future.
Counsel for the Pursuer (Reclaimer)— Kennedy. Agents— W. Adam & Winchester, S.S.C.
Counsel for the Defender (Respondent)— Mair. Agent— Charles B. Hogg, Solicitor.
