BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Campbell v. County Council of Peeblesshire [1893] ScotLR 30_252 (17 January 1893) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1893/30SLR0252.html Cite as: [1893] SLR 30_252, [1893] ScotLR 30_252 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 252↓
[
In an action of damages in respect of the death of a child, held (following Campbell v. Maddison, November 5, 1873, 1 R. 149) that the successful pursuer was entitled to charge as fees for the trial £21 for senior and £15, 15s. for junior counsel for the first day, and £15, 15s. to senior counsel and £10, 10s. to junior counsel for the second day, on the ground that the trial, besides assessment of damages, involved questions of contributory negligence, and points of law as to liability between the defenders and certain other parties in a question with the pursuer, who was a tenant of these parties.
William Campbell, warper, Walkerburn, raised an action against the County Council of the county of Peebles for payment of the sum of £250 as compensation in respect of the death on 4th December 1891 of his son John Campbell, a boy six years of age, through the fault of the defenders in failing to sufficiently fence part of the turnpike road leading through the village of Walkerburn. The defence was a denial of liability, and contributory negligence on the part of the pursuer and the boy, and the defenders further maintained that certain feuars were liable for the maintenance of the wall at the part of the road in question, and over which the boy had fallen into vacant area ground in front of an adjoining tenement of dwelling-houses.
The case was tried by Lord Kincairney, Ordinary, with a jury, and lasted two days; thirteen witnesses were examined for the pursuer, and five for the defenders. The jury returned a verdict for the pursuer with £50 damages.
Page: 253↓
The verdict was applied, and the pursuer found entitled to expenses.
After taxation the pursuer lodged a note of objections to the report of the Auditor upon his account of expenses, which had been taxed at £193, 12s. 5d. The main items of the objections were the 4th and 5th of his note, dealing with fees of counsel and charges incident thereto for their attendance at the trial, involving a sum of £16, 18s. 2d. taxed off by the Auditor.
Salvesen, for the pursuer, submitted that the Auditor was wrong in allowing fees to counsel for the trial only at the rate to senior of 15 guineas for the first day instead of 20 guineas, and 12 guineas for the second day instead of 15 guineas, and to junior at the rate of 10 guineas instead of 15 guineas for the first day, and 8 guineas instead of 10 guineas for the second day. The scale he contended for was usual in jury trials. Here points of law as to liability between the defenders and certain feuars in a question with the pursuer, a tenant of the property of the latter, had been raised at the trial, as well as points in regard to contributory negligence. In regard to this latter point the defenders excepted to the charge of the Court to the jury, but did not proceed with their bill of exceptions.
The defenders supported the Auditor's taxation. The fixing of the scale of fees was one entirely within his discretion. The trial was of a simple description. No injustice could be done to the pursuer by the adherence of the Court to the report, in respect that in the present case the fees of his counsel were not sent at the time.
Pursuer's Authorities— Campbell v. Ord & Maddison, November 5, 1873, 1 R. 149; Black v. Mason, March 1881, 8 R. 666; Young v. Johnston & Wright, May 19, 1880, 7 R. 760.
Defenders' Authority— Wilson v. North British Railway Company, December 13, 1873, 1 R. 305.
Counsel for Pursuers— Comrie Thomson— Wilton. Agent— W. M. Morris, S.S.C.
Counsel for Defenders— Guthrie— Cook. Agents— Traquair, Dickson, & M'Laren, W.S.
