BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Watson (Fraser's Trustee) v. Fraser [1896] ScotLR 33_713 (7 July 1896) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1896/33SLR0713.html Cite as: [1896] ScotLR 33_713, [1896] SLR 33_713 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Page: 713↓
[Sheriff of Forfarshire.
The trustee on the sequestrated estate of a wine and spirit merchant who was tenant of a public-house, held entitled, under the 91st section of the Bankruptcy Act 1856, to production and delivery of the bankrupt's permit book and certificate of licence.
This was an appeal presented by Hugh Hayes Watson, trustee on the sequestrated estate of Mrs Jane Fraser, who carried on business as a wine and spirit merchant in a public-house of which she was tenant, against certain deliverances of the Sheriff-Substitute ( Smith) at Dundee in the statutory examination of the bankrupt.
the deliverances appealed against were as follows—“At Dundee, 24th June 1896, in presence of John Campbell Smith, Esquire, Advocate, Sheriff-Substitute of Forfarshire at Dundee. Present … Compeared the bankrupt, Mrs Jane Fraser, who being solemnly sworn and examined, depones, … The agent for the trustee moved that the bankrupt be ordained to deliver up the permit book. Deliverance.—The Sheriff-Substitute ordained the bankrupt to allow the trustee to have access to the permit book on all occasions desired by him when it was necessary that he should have the use of the permit book in order to obtain information in regard to the estate: Quoad ultra refused the motion.… ( Q) Are you willing to give up your certificate of licence to the trustee? Deliverance—Question disallowed.”
The Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1856 (19 and 20 Vict. cap. 79), sec. 9, enacts—“The bankrupt and such other persons shall answer all lawful questions relating to the affairs of the bankrupt; and the Sheriff may order such persons to produce for inspection any books of account, papers, deeds, writings, or other documents in their custody relative to the bankrupt's affairs, and cause the same, or copies thereof, to be delivered to the trustee.”
Argued for the appellant—(1) The trustee in bankruptcy was entitled to the permit book, for that alone would enable him to check the transactions of the bankrupt, who was still carrying on business. (2) He was also entitled to the bankrupt's certificate of licence, which formed part of the assets of the estate, and which would be transferred under section 19 of the Home Drummond Act (9 George IV. cap. 58) to the purchaser of the business from the trustee— Clift v. Portobello Pier Company, Feb. 10, 1877, 4 R. 462. The certificate was a mere accessory of the lease and the goodwill— Selkirk v. Coupland,
Page: 714↓
January 6, 1886, 23 S.L.R, 456; and the trustee was entitled to it under the Bankruptcy Act without raising an action to enforce his right— Selkirk v. Service) Oct. 22, 1880, 8 R. 29. Argued for the respondent (the bankrupt)—The appeal was incompetent. The question at stake here was as to the right of property in the certificate, and that could not be raised and determined in the bankrupt's examination. In Coupland a minute setting forth the facts was required to be lodged before the Court pronounced a decision. No such material had been put before the Court here. In any event the Sheriff was right. The trustee had been allowed access to the permit book, and he knew the terms of the certificate. The certificate itself was purely personal, analogous to a pilot's licence, and did not vest in the trustee. Authorities cited— Delvoitte & Co. v. Baillie's Trustees, Nov. 16, 1877, 5 R. 143; Yuille v. Rushbury, July 4, 1888, 15 R. 828; Philp's Executor v. Philp's Executor, February 1, 1894, 21 R. 482.
At advising—
Lord President—This appeal is not a very satisfactory proceeding, if the object of parties be to ascertain the ultimate rights of the trustee and the bankrupt respectively to this certificate of licence. But we must consider the matter as it is presented to us, and I think that, prima facie, the trustee is entitled to have delivered to him the permit book, as being one of the books of this bankrupt trader, and the licence, as being a document relating to the business of the bankrupt. What right the trustee may have to make use of the certificate of licence, and his power of disposing of it, must depend upon questions which we are not in a position to decide: as thus—if it be the fact that the bankrupt is tenant of these premises, and is using the certificate to carry on the trade, the trustee may or may not be in a position to take the business and get the licence transferred to a purchaser of the business from him; if, on the other hand, the bankrupt can make out some such case as that suggested at the bar, that may lead to another result. On that I do not pronounce.
It seems to me that the question is, In whose hands, in the first instance, shall these documents be? And I answer that by saying, they should be in the hands of the trustee.
As regards procedure, the Sheriff has, in the first place, merely ordained the bankrupt to allow the trustee to have access to the book. That seems an inadequate remedy and an inadequate satisfaction of the trustee's right. And accordingly I think that must be recalled. As regards the question disallowed, that raises the matter of the certificate in a very unsatisfactory way. I must say I do not think the question was necessary at all, except as a matter of mere politeness. The trustee's right to the certificate in no way depended upon the willingness of the bankrupt to give it up. Therefore I think we should go a step further, and save any questions which may arise in the Court below by remitting to the Sheriff to order the licence to be produced and delivered to the trustee.
The Court recalled the deliverance of the Sheriff as to the permit book, and remitted to the Sheriff to order the licence to be produced and delivered to the trustee.
Counsel for the Appellant— Sol.-Gen. Dickson— H. Johnston. Agent— James Purves, S.S.C.
Counsel for the Respondent— Salvesen— W. L. Mackenzie. Agent— J. A. Pattullo, S.S.C.
