BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £5, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

Scottish Court of Session Decisions
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Youngs, Petitioners. v [1906] ScotLR 43_648 (28 August 1906)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1906/43SLR0648.html
Cite as: [1906] ScotLR 43_648, [1906] SLR 43_648

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]

SCOTTISH_SLR_Court_of_Session

Page: 648↓

Court of Session Second Division.

Monday, August 28 1906.

[ Lord Ardwall, Ordinary on the Bills.

43 SLR 648

Youngs, Petitioners.

v.


Subject_1Judicial Factor
Subject_2Special Powers
Subject_3Power to Sell Heritable Subject
Subject_4Report by Accountant of Court against Power Craved — Power Granted by Court.
Facts:

Circumstances in which a petition for the appointment of a judicial factor on an intestate estate, with special power to sell a heritable property included in the said estate, having been presented, the Court granted the special power craved, although the Accountant of Court, to whom a remit had been made, had reported against the special power being granted.

Headnote:

This was a petition presented by Mrs Jeanie Cunninghame M'Bride or Young, residing at Garail, Dunoon, and Alexander Young, residing at Cessford, Troon, for the appointment of a judicial factor on the estate of the deceased John Reid Young, who had died intestate. The petitioners were the widow and the eldest son and heir-at-law of the deceased.

The petition, inter alia, sought power for the factor to complete a title to and to sell a villa known as Garail, situated at Dunoon.

It was stated in the petition that the widow was desirous of leaving Dunoon in order to provide suitable education for her children, that it would probably be difficult, and certainly not remunerative, to let Garail for a term of years unfurnished, that the property was only suitable for residential purposes during the summer months, and that it would be impossible to let for a summer tenancy unless the furniture were to remain in the house, and that even if a satisfactory rent were received for the summer months a considerable amount would be involved in the upkeep. It was also stated that it was the intention of the deceased prior to his death to sell Garail during 1905.

The Lord Ordinary having remitted to the Accountant of Court to consider and report with reference to the power of sale craved, the Accountant inter alia reported as follows—“The gross annual income of the estate may be stated at from £750 to £850, divisible one-third to the widow, and two-thirds to children. That as stated the present assessed rent of Garail is £85, but the valued rent is £110, from which deduct a liberal estimate to meet feu-duty, taxes, and repairs, &c., £59, leaving £51, which is 4J per cent. on £1200, the proposed upset price, a higher rate than can be obtained from investment in trust securities. In these circumstances the Accountant cannot report in favour of a sale as craved, there being neither necessity nor high expediency. See case of Gilligan, May 14,1898, 25 R. 876, 35 S.L.R. 690.”

 Judgment:

Lord Ardwall—“It is with hesitation that I consider myself bound in this case in the interests of the estate to take a different view from the Accountant of Court. The case of Gilligan's Factor, 25 R. 876, is an authority for my doing so. On the merits that case differs most materially from the present. There the value of the property consisted in the site, which was in an improving and central locality in Glasgow, and the site was practically certain to rise largely in value and it would have been folly to sell it. Further, the petition was opposed by the pupil's grandmother. In the present case the subjects belong to a class of property which it is notorious has enormously decreased and will probably decrease still more in value. This is owing to the opinion that has gained ground amongst the well-to-do inhabitants of Glasgow that a more beneficial change of air can be got by going to the central and eastern portions of Scotland than by going “down the water” as it is called. There are also greater railway facilities than formerly, and persons from Glasgow can reach such places as Stirling, Dunblane, Callender, Crieff, Comrie, St Fillans, Crawford, Biggar, and other places in the upper ward of Lanarkshire, and even watering-places on the Fife Coast, with comparative ease. Building of villas and cottages has greatly increased recently in all those localities, and the new erections are greatly taken advantage of by people from Glasgow. There is therefore no future in such a property as that in question. Further, it is a most undesirable class of property to keep as a letting subject. There is always the initial difficulty of getting a tenant, rendering the obtaining of any income uncertain. If in any year a tenant is not obtained the garden and greenhouses must be kept up at an expense probably of not less than £60 to £10(3 a-year without a return. There is, further, the difficulty about wear and tear of furniture if it is let furnished. I have had experience myself both personally and among my friends of

Page: 649↓

the letting of country houses, and there cannot be a more unsatisfactory kind of business, nor could an investment more troublesome in its character or more uncertain and unreliable in its returns be imagined. The Accountant in his report proceeds solely on the assumption that a steady return of £110 a-year will be got from the property. This assumption is, in my opinion, wholly unwarranted, and almost certain to turn out fallacious. I am of opinion that in the interests of the estate the property should be sold as soon as possible. I proceed both on the report of Messrs Binnie, who are very skilled valuators, and on my own knowledge and experience. In my opinion it is highly expedient that leave to sell the subjects in question should be granted.”

The following interlocutor was accordingly pronounced:—“The Lord Ordinary officiating on the Bills having resumed consideration of the petition and proceedings with the report by the Accountant of Court and heard counsel for the petitioner thereon, authorises and empowers the judicial factor, James Watson Stewart, to sell the property of Garail, Dunoon, described in the first place in the prayer of the petition, by public roup, after due advertisement, at the upset price of £1200, and if not sold at or above said upset price to re-expose the same at such reduced upset price as may be fixed by the Accountant, and on a sale and payment of the price to grant a disposition thereof, containing the usual and necessary clauses, and to grant all other deeds requisite and necessary for rendering such sale effectual, and decerns: Finds the petitioners entitled to the expenses of this application and all procedure following thereon; allows an account of said expenses to be given into process.”

 Counsel:

Counsel for the Petitioners—J. G. Jameson. Agent— T. J. Martin, W.S.

 1906

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1906/43SLR0648.html