BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> VA319132012 [2013] UKAITUR VA319132012 (13 September 2013) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2013/VA319132012.html Cite as: [2013] UKAITUR VA319132012 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: VA/31913/2012
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House |
Determination Promulgated |
On 10 September 2013 |
On 13 September 2013 |
|
|
Before
Lord Bannatyne sitting as Judge of the Upper Tribunal
Upper Tribunal Judge Kekić
Between
Stella Ololade Olufon
Appellant
and
Entry Clearance Officer
Lagos
Respondent
NOTICE
Representation
For the appellant: Mr A O Modupe, Legal Representative
For the respondent: Mr T Wilding, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
1. The appellant is a national of Nigeria born on 10 October 1950. Her appeal against the refusal of entry clearance as a visitor was allowed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Raymond on 17 July 2013. The ECO (whom we continue to refer to as the respondent for ease of reference) challenged the determination only on maintenance and accommodation grounds and permission to appeal was granted by First-tier Tribunal Judge Nicholson on the basis that it was arguable that the judge had erred in failing to consider those matters.
2. At the hearing of the appeal on 10 September, Mr Wilding sought permission to withdraw the respondent’s challenge to the determination. He acknowledged that in the review by the EC Manager, maintenance and accommodation had been conceded and explained that his colleague who drafted the grounds had not seen that concession. Mr Modupe was content with the withdrawal which we agreed to.
3. As there is no longer any challenge to the decision of the First-tier Tribunal, the determination allowing the appeal remains effective.
Signed:
Dr R Kekić
Judge of the Upper Tribunal
12 September 2013