BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA118642014 [2014] UKAITUR IA118642014 (19 December 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA118642014.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA118642014 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: IA/11864/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
| No hearing | Promulgated on |
| 19 December 2014 | |
|
|
|
Before
MR C M G OCKELTON, VICE PRESIDENT
Between
AHMED SAAD MOSELHY DWIDDAR
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. The relevant facts are set out in a letter I sent to the parties on 30 October 2014.
“In this appeal the (original) appellant succeeded before the First-tier Tribunal to the extent that the decision refusing him leave was set aside on the grounds that it was unlawful. The First-tier Tribunal did not allow the appeal substantively or direct that leave (or other status) be granted.
The Secretary of State sought and obtained permission to appeal to this Tribunal, on grounds that are more than arguable. However in the mean time the original appellant has been granted a residence card as a family member of an EEA national, and no longer wishes to pursue the original application.
There is clearly no purpose in the matter being determined substantively by this Tribunal. The original appellant has sought to ‘withdraw his appeal’: but that he cannot do as the appeal to the Upper Tribunal is not his appeal. In order to avoid further delay and expense I propose to issue a determination without a hearing, the decision in which will be formally to allow the Secretary of State’s appeal, whilst observing that the outcome of these proceedings should not, in the circumstances, be treated as constituting a reasoned decision on any element of the case of either party.
Any proposal to the contrary will be considered if received within 21 days of the date of this letter.”
2. There has been no response.
3. The Secretary of State’s appeal is allowed. That decision should not be regarded as a reasoned decision on any element of either party’s case.
C. M. G. OCKELTON
VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
IMMIGRATION AND ASYLUM CHAMBER
Date: 16 December 2014
