BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA234582013 [2014] UKAITUR IA234582013 (7 November 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/IA234582013.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR IA234582013 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/23458/2013
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Field House | Determination Promulgated |
On 29th September 2014 | On 7th November 2014 |
|
|
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RIMINGTON
Between
Mr Vyacheslav Ovdyeyenko
(No Anonymity Direction Made)
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation:
For the Appellant: Mr Bazini, instructed by Gulbenkian Andonian Solicitors
For the Respondent: Mr Melvin, Home Office Presenting Officer
DECISION AND REASONS
1. At the hearing before me Mr Bazini submitted that one of the witnesses for the appellant had been taken to hospital and would be unable to attend. Mr Melvin did not challenge an adjournment.
2. Mr Bazini accepted that the IS 151 notice had been served on the appellant in 1998. He now submitted that the evidence disclosed that the appellant had a relationship within the UK with Ms Galitcki which was not previously argued.
3. Having found an error of law in the First Tier Tribunal determination the matter is remitted to the First Tier Tribunal in accordance with Practice Direction 7.2(b) of the Presidential Practice Statement dated 25 September 2012. Having regard to the nature and extent of the judicial fact finding necessary in order for the decision in the appeal to be re-made in the light of the overriding objective in rule 2, it is appropriate to remit the case to the First-tier Tribunal.
Signed Date 29th September 2014
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Rimington