BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> OA193592012 [2014] UKAITUR OA193592012 (21 July 2014) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2014/OA193592012.html Cite as: [2014] UKAITUR OA193592012 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: OA/19359/2012
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Glasgow | Determination promulgated |
on 17 July 2014 | On 21 July 2014 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN
Between
ENTRY CLEARANCE OFFICER, New Delhi
Appellant
and
AMRINDER BARMOTA
Respondent
For the Appellant: Mrs M O’Brien, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
For the Respondent: Mr C H Ndubuisi, of Drummond Miller, Solicitors
No anonymity order requested or made
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. The SSHD appeals against a determination by First-tier Tribunal Judge Quigley, dismissing his appeal against refusal of entry clearance as a spouse.
2. The grounds dispute the judge’s finding on maintenance, pointing out that the sponsor has “three children in the UK, with one son who suffers from addiction problems and is dependent upon her”.
3. Mrs O’Brien said that the grounds had apparently been prepared on the basis of the determination only. The author would not have been aware of the underlying reality that the sponsor’s children are adult, and the financial dependency of any of them upon the sponsor had not been one of the issues in the case.
4. The evidence before the judge was enough to satisfy her as to the maintenance requirements of the rules. The grounds of appeal to the UT do not raise any other issue.
5. The determination of the First-tier Tribunal shall stand.
17 July 2014
Judge of the Upper Tribunal