BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> AA115132014 [2015] UKAITUR AA115132014 (22 December 2015)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/AA115132014.html
Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR AA115132014

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]



 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: AA/11513/2014

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

Heard at Bradford

Decision & Reasons Promulgated

On 19 th November 2015

On 22 nd December 2015

 

 

 

Before

 

upper tribunal JUDGE roberts

 

Between

 

Mr Yasine Badreddine

(ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)

Appellant

 

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

 

Respondent

 

 

Representation :

 

For the Appellant: Mr C Cole, Solicitor for Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors

For the Respondent: Mrs R Pettersen, Home Office Presenting Officer

 

DECISION ON WITHDRAWAL

Pursuant to Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008

1.              This appeal came before me, following a grant of permission against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge AK Simpson, who in a decision promulgated on 9 th July 2015, allowed the Appellant's appeal against the Respondent's refusal to issue him with an EEA Residence Card, to the limited extent of remitting the matter back to the Respondent. The appeal was also allowed on Article 8 grounds; and it is that matter which prompted the Respondent to seek permission to appeal the decision.

2.              The Appellant is a citizen of Algeria and he sought to remain in the United Kingdom because he is in a durable relationship with a Polish national who is in the UK exercising Treaty rights.

3.              Following discussion between the parties, Mrs Pettersen on behalf of the Respondent sought to withdraw the appeal on this basis.

·                The FtT Judge's decision to remit the matter to the Secretary of State for consideration of the Appellant's right to a Residence Card stands. This is on the basis that a finding has been made by the FtT Judge that the Appellant and his Polish national partner are in a durable relationship. That finding stands.

·                The Appellant and his representatives do not pursue implementation of the Article 8 ECHR findings made by the Judge.

4.              Rule 17 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 provide that an appeal before the Upper Tribunal may be withdrawn only with the consent of that Tribunal. I hereby consent to the withdrawal of the appeal on the terms outlined above, which have been agreed by the representatives.

5.              The effect is that the Secretary of State will now reconsider the Appellant's case in the light of the FtT's findings on the durable relationship existing between the Appellant and his Polish partner.

 

No anonymity direction is made

 

 

Signature Dated

 

Judge C Roberts

Judge of the Upper Tribunal

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/AA115132014.html