BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA117642014 [2015] UKAITUR IA117642014 (18 May 2015) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/IA117642014.html Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR IA117642014 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/11764/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Determined at Field House |
Determination Promulgated |
On: 18 May 2015 |
On: 18 May 2015 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE RINTOUL
Between
HABEEB UR RAHMAN SYED
Appellants
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL AND
REASONS FOR THE TRIBUNAL GIVING CONSENT
1. The appellant is a citizen of Bangladesh who appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against the decision of the Secretary of State of 25 February 2014. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the appeals in a determination promulgated on 20 November 2014. Upper Tribunal Judge Coker granted the appellant permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.
2. By way of a letter to the Upper Tribunal dated 15 May 2015 the appellant states that he wishes to withdraw his appeal.
3. Consent of the Upper Tribunal is required for a party to withdraw its case. Having carefully considered the facts of this appeal as a whole, and observing that the Secretary of State was the successful party before the First-tier Tribunal, I give such consent to the appellant to withdraw his case.
4. Accordingly with my consent, and pursuant to rule 17(5) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, this appeal is recorded as “Withdrawn with the consent of the Upper Tribunal”. This is a Notice pursuant to rule 17(5) to inform the parties that the appellant’s case is withdrawn.
5. The effect of the appellant’s case being withdrawn from the Upper Tribunal is that the proceedings before the Upper Tribunal are at an end. There is no appeal before the Upper Tribunal and the First-tier Tribunal’s decision shall stand.
Signed Date: 18 May 2015
Upper Tribunal Judge Rintoul