BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA439712014 [2015] UKAITUR IA439712014 (28 August 2015)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/IA439712014.html
Cite as: [2015] UKAITUR IA439712014

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/43971/2014

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS



Determined at Field House

Decision and Reasons Promulgations

On: 26 August 2015

On 28 August 2015

 

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE O'CONNOR

 

 

Between

 

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Appellant

and

 

Muhammad Farooq

Respondent



NOTICE OF DECISION

1.              The Secretary of State brings an appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the decision of FTTJ Hagan, allowing Mr Farooq's appeal against a decision refusing him leave to enter. Permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal was granted on the 22 June 2015.

2.              However, prior to this, on 2 May 2015, the Secretary of State granted Mr Farooq leave to remain. Mr Farooq's section 82 appeal is to be treated as abandon pursuant to section 104(4A) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002, at the point in time that the grant of leave was made. This has a number of possible consequences. It seems to me that as a consequence of such abandonment the Upper Tribunal had no jurisdiction to grant permission and such grant is to be treated as a nullity. That brings these proceedings to an end, and the determination of the First-tier Tribunal remains standing.

3.              If I am wrong in treating the appeal before the Upper Tribunal as a nullity then, in any event, Mr Walker sought to withdraw the Secretary of State's appeal thereto. Insofar as is necessary, and for reasons which are obvious, I consent to this course. As such the Secretary of State's case before the Upper Tribunal is withdrawn and the First-tier Tribunal's determination remains standing.

 

 

Signed:

 

Upper Tribunal Judge O'Connor

Date: 27 August 2015

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2015/IA439712014.html