BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> DA000632015 [2016] UKAITUR DA000632015 (19 January 2016) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2016/DA000632015.html Cite as: [2016] UKAITUR DA000632015, [2016] UKAITUR DA632015 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DA /00063/2015
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
|
On 14 January 2016 |
On 19 January 2016 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE ESHUN
Between
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
and
PETER OLUWADAMILOLA SHOWEMIMO
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr. S Whitwell, HOPO
For the Respondent: In person
DECISION ON ERROR OF LAW
1. The Secretary of State appeals with leave against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Petherbridge allowing the appeal of the respondent against the decision of the Secretary of State dated 9 August 2013 to make a deportation order against him by virtue of Section 32(5) of the UK Borders Act 2007.
2. The judge found the respondent, his mother and sister to be credible witnesses. He relied on the findings made by the judge in the sister's appeal against the deportation order made against her.
3. I find however that the judge failed to consider the particular circumstances of this respondent in respect of his appeal against the deportation order against him.
4. The judge found that the respondent has lived in the UK continuously since his birth and therefore it must follow that he has no social or cultural ties with Nigeria.
6. The judge heard the appeal on 19 August 2015. It appears that he considered the respondent's appeal under the old paragraph 339A. Paragraph 399A was amended on 28 July 2014. The judge's reliance on the old paragraph 399A led to his failure to properly consider whether the respondent met all of the requirements of the current paragraph 399A. The requirements are whether the respondent has been lawfully resident in the UK for most of his life, whether he is socially and culturally integrated in the UK; and whether there would be very significant obstacles to his reintegration into Nigerian society.
7. The errors are material. The judge's decision cannot stand.
8. The appeal is remitted to Taylor House for rehearing by a First-tier Judge other than FtTJ Petherbridge.
Signed Date
Upper Tribunal Judge Eshun
