BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA289042014 [2016] UKAITUR IA289042014 (13 January 2016) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2016/IA289042014.html Cite as: [2016] UKAITUR IA289042014 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: IA/28904/2014
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Birmingham |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 11 January 2016 |
On 13 January 2016 |
|
|
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SAFFER
Between
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
And
SAFIA AKMAL
(NO ANONYMITY ORDER MADE)
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr Mills a Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
For the Respondent: Mr Ali a Legal Representative
DECISION AND REASONS
Background
1. The Secretary of State notified Mrs Akmal on 15 July 2014 of her decision to refuse to grant leave to remain and requiring her to leave. Mrs Akmal's appeal against that decision was allowed by First-tier Tribunal Judge McDade ("the Judge") following a hearing on 30 January 2015. This is an appeal against that decision.
2. Designated Judge Macdonald granted permission to appeal on 13 April 2015 as;
"... it is unclear why the Tribunal was referring to a verification report and the judge does not say that the original language certificate was produced".
3. Mr Mills conceded that the original English language certificate was on his file and he had no reason to doubt it had been produced at the hearing. Accordingly he did not wish to pursue the appeal.
4. I am satisfied, given the concession, that the Judge would have said he had not seen the English language certificate if that was the case. Accordingly I am satisfied that it was in fact produced and the Judge was entitled to be satisfied that all aspects of the relevant rule had been satisfied.
Decision
The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal did not involve the making of an error on a point of law.
I do not set aside the decision.
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Saffer
12 January 2016