BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA119902016 [2017] UKAITUR PA119902016 (20 July 2017) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2017/PA119902016.html Cite as: [2017] UKAITUR PA119902016 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/11990/2016
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Heard at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
|
On 19 July 2017 |
On 20 July 2017 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE KOPIECZEK
Between
AMINA JUNAJI
Appellant
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Ms S. Caseley, Counsel
For the Respondent: Mr I. Jarvis, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 39 OF THE TRIBUNAL PROCEDURE (UPPER TRIBUNAL) RULES 2008
1. The appellant is a citizen of Zimbabwe. She appealed to the First-tier Tribunal ("FtT) against a decision dated 14 October 2016 to refuse her asylum and human rights claim. First-tier Tribunal Judge Carroll ("the FtJ") dismissed her appeal on all grounds after a hearing on 17 March 2017.
2. Permission to appeal against the decision of the FtJ having been granted, her appeal came before me.
3. By consent, the parties agreed the following:
(i) the matters advanced in the grounds of appeal to the Upper Tribunal reveal material errors of law in the FtJ's decision in relation to the assessment of credibility; and
(ii) that the FtJ's decision should be set aside; and
(iii) that the appeal should be remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for a hearing de novo before a First-tier Tribunal Judge other than First-tier Tribunal Judge Carroll.
4. Having heard the parties, and considering rule 39 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, I make a consent order in the terms expressed in [3] above, considering it appropriate to do so, and thus remitting the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal for a hearing de novo before a First-tier Tribunal Judge other than First-tier Tribunal Judge Carroll, with no findings of fact preserved.
5. The consent order is as contained herein, no separate document being required.
Upper Tribunal Judge Kopieczek 19/07/17
