BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> EA041542016 [2018] UKAITUR EA041542016 (28 June 2018) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/EA041542016.html Cite as: [2018] UKAITUR EA41542016, [2018] UKAITUR EA041542016 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: EA/04154/2016
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
|
On 28 June 2018 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE O'CONNOR
Between
LAZIZ KHUDAYBERDIEV
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
DECISION AND REASONS
Introduction
1. The appellant is a national of Uzbekistan born 25.5.1987. He made an application to the Secretary of State for an EEA residence card. The application was refused in a decision served on 19.4.16, for reasons that I need not need to set out herein.
Decision of the First-tier Tribunal
2. The appellant lodged an appeal before the FtT. That appeal came before FtT Judge Farmer, who concluded in a decision promulgated 12.9.17, that the FtT did not have jurisdiction to determine the appeal. No findings were made in relation to the substance of the appeal. The Judge's conclusion was informed by the guidance given by this Tribunal in Sala [2016] UKUT 411.
3. The appellant appealed such decision to the Upper Tribunal and FtT Judge Brunnen granted permission. Thus, the matter comes before me.
Discussion
4. The Court of Appeal has now given consideration to the very issue in play in the instant case - see Khan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 1755. The Court concluded that the Upper Tribunal had been wrong in its conclusion and rationale in Sala. It is not in dispute that the effect of the decision in Khan, if applied to this case, is that the First-tier Tribunal was wrong to conclude that it did not have jurisdiction in this appeal.
5. For this reason, I set aside the decision of the First-tier Tribunal and remit the appeal back to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard afresh.
Decision
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside.
The appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal.
Signed Date 19 th June 2018
Upper Tribunal Judge O'Connor
