BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA016802017 [2018] UKAITUR PA016802017 (17 April 2018) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2018/PA016802017.html Cite as: [2018] UKAITUR PA16802017, [2018] UKAITUR PA016802017 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/01680/2017
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at Bradford |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
On 20 March 2018 |
On 17 April 2018 |
Before
DEPUTY UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE DAVEY
Between
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
and
[S B]
(ANONYMITY DIRECTION NOT MADE)
Respondent
Representation :
For the Appellant: Mr A McVeety, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
For the Respondent: Ms Cleghorn, Counsel instructed by Bradford Law Centre
DECISION AND REASONS
1. In this appeal the Appellant is the Secretary of State for the Home Department. The Respondent is the Claimant.
2. The Claimant, a national of Cameroon, appealed against the SSHD's decision to refuse an asylum claim on 9 February 2017. The appeal was dismissed by FtT Judge I Howard on 27 November 2017. Permission to appeal the Judge's decision was given to the SSHD on 29 December 2017. A cross appeal was given permission on 15 February 2018 by UTJ King TD.
3. It is clear that the Judge rejected the appeal on the findings of fact but in error went on to allow the appeal on Refugee Convention and Article 3 ECHR grounds. On that basis it could have been dealt with under the Slip Rule [Rule 31 of The Tribunal Procedure Rules 2014].
4. The cross appeal is based upon the Judge's failure to address the psychiatric assessment of the Claimant's mental health/suicide risk and the assessment of him being a victim of torture.
5. The parties jointly submitted that the Judge's errors, particularly the consideration of the Claimant's mental health, required a re-assessment of the adverse credibility findings.
6. I agree with them. The original Tribunal's decision cannot stand nor any findings of fact.
NOTICE OF DECISION
7. The appeal of the Secretary of State is allowed to the extent that the matter must be re-made in the FtT (IAC).
No anonymity order is required.
DIRECTIONS
List FtT, not before First-tier Tribunal Judge I Howard.
2 hours.
French interpreter required.
Any further documents or evidence relied upon to be served on the parties not less than ten working days before the further hearing.
A PTR to be arranged if required in writing with reasons by the parties.
Signed Date 28 March 2018
Deputy Upper Tribunal Judge Davey