BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA025022018 & PA025052018 [2019] UKAITUR PA025022018 (4 March 2019)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2019/PA025022018.html
Cite as: [2019] UKAITUR PA25022018, [2019] UKAITUR PA025022018

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Numbers: PA/02502/2018

PA/02505/2018

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Glasgow

Decision & Reasons Promulgated

on 01 March 2019

On 04 March 2019

 

 

 

Before

 

UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN

 

 

Between

 

AMOS [A]

&

ABIDEMI [A]

Appellants

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent

 

 

For the 1st Appellant: Ms S H McKeeve, of McGlashan MacKay, Solicitors

For the 2nd Appellant: Mr M Templeton, of Quinn, Martin & Langan, Solicitors

For the Respondent: Mr A Govan, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DETERMINATION AND REASONS

1.              The appellants appeal against a decision by First-tier Tribunal Judge David C Clapham SSC, promulgated on 7 June 2018.

2.              Mr Govan conceded that the grounds showed that central issues of fact were left unresolved; a legally inadequate explanation was given for the outcome; and the decision could not be saved on grounds of internal relocation, because the unresolved contentions of the appellants went, in part, to the reach of the alleged persecutors.

3.              Parties agreed that the outcome should be as follows.

4.              The decision of the FtT is set aside. It stands only as a record of what was said at the hearing.

5.              The nature of the case is such that it is appropriate under section 12 of the 2007 Act, and under Practice Statement 7.2, to remit to the FtT for an entirely fresh hearing.

6.              The member(s) of the FtT chosen to consider the case are not to include Judge Clapham.

7.              No anonymity direction has been requested or made.

 

 

 

 

1 March 2019

UT Judge Macleman

 

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2019/PA025022018.html