BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> HU184772019 [2020] UKAITUR HU184772019 (9 December 2020) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2020/HU184772019.html Cite as: [2020] UKAITUR HU184772019 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
IAC-AH- SC-V1
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: HU/18477/2019
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Determined on the Papers at Field House |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
|
On 20 November 2020 |
On 09 December 2020 |
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE ALLEN
Between
ms Allah-Rakhi
(anonymity direction made)
Appellant
and
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The appellant is a national of Pakistan. She appealed to a Judge of the First-tier Tribunal against the Secretary of State's decision on 30 October 2019 to refuse her application for leave to remain in the United Kingdom on the basis of her private life.
2. The judge dismissed the appeal but subsequently permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal was granted by a Judge of the First-tier Tribunal.
3. Following the sending out of directions on 11 August 2020 a response was received from both parties. I mention in particular the response from the Secretary of State in which it was accepted that the judge had erred in law in that in light of the decision of the Supreme Court in AM (Zimbabwe) [2020] UKSC 17, the wrong test had been applied for the evaluation of the appellant's claim for leave to remain on medical grounds.
4. I agree with the view expressed on behalf of the Secretary of State and with the proposed outcome. This appeal is allowed to the extent that it is remitted for a full re-hearing in the First-tier Tribunal in Glasgow before a judge other than Judge Conway.
Direction Regarding Anonymity - Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008
Unless and until a Tribunal or court directs otherwise, the appellant is granted anonymity. No report of these proceedings shall directly or indirectly identify him or any member of their family. This direction applies both to the appellant and to the respondent. Failure to comply with this direction could lead to contempt of court proceedings.
Signed Date 3 rd December 2020
Upper Tribunal Judge Allen
