BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA002142020 [2020] UKAITUR PA002142020 (7 December 2020) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2020/PA002142020.html Cite as: [2020] UKAITUR PA002142020, [2020] UKAITUR PA2142020 |
||
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
IAC-FH-CK-V1
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: PA/00214/2020 (P)
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
|
Decided under rule 34 Without a hearing |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 07 December 2020 |
|
On 28 November 2020 |
|
|
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE SHERIDAN
Between
RK
(ANONYMITY DIRECTIOn made)
Appellant
and
SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Respondent
Representation
For the Appellant: Fountain Solicitors
For the Respondent: H. Aboni, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer
Direction Regarding Anonymity
Unless and until a Tribunal or court directs otherwise, the appellant is granted anonymity. No report of these proceedings shall directly or indirectly identify him or any member of his family. This direction applies both to the appellant and to the respondent. Failure to comply with this direction could lead to contempt of court proceedings.
DECISION AND REASONS
1. The appellant is appealing against a decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Gillespie ("the judge") promulgated on 18 March 2020.
2. Permission to appeal was granted on 23 September 2020 by Upper Tribunal Judge Smith.
3. On 9 October 2020 the respondent wrote to the Upper Tribunal stating that the appellant's application is not opposed and inviting the Upper Tribunal to set aside of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal and remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal.
4. In the light of the position of the respondent, I am satisfied that it is consistent with rule 2 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules to determine this appeal without a hearing.
5. As both parties have invited the Upper Tribunal to set aside the decision and remit the appeal, I set aside the decision (the parties having agreed that it involved the making of an error on a point of law) and remit the appeal to the First-tier Tribunal to be considered afresh with no findings preserved.
Notice of Decision
a. The appeal is allowed.
b. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside and the appeal is remitted to the First-tier Tribunal to be heard afresh by a different judge.
|
Signed
D. Sheridan
|
|
|
Upper Tribunal Judge Sheridan |
Dated: 28 November 2020
|
