BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> PA121952018 [2020] UKAITUR PA121952018 (5 March 2020)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2020/PA121952018.html
Cite as: [2020] UKAITUR PA121952018

[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]


Asylum and Immigration tribunal-b&w-tiff"

 

Upper Tribunal

(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) PA/12195/2018

 

 

THE IMMIGRATION ACTS

 

 

Heard at Edinburgh

Decision & Reasons Promulgated

On 27 February 2020

On 5 March 2020

 

 

 

Before

 

UT JUDGE MACLEMAN

 

 

Between

 

HONG [P]

Appellant

and

 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT

Respondent

 

 

For the Appellant: Mr A J Bradley, of A J Bradley & Co, Solicitors

For the Respondent: Mr A Govan, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer

 

 

DETERMINATION AND REASONS

1.              FtT Judge Doyle dismissed the appellant's appeal by a decision promulgated on 28 February 2019. The FtT and the UT refuse permission to appeal. The appellant petitioned the Court of Session for reduction of the UT's refusal of permission.

2.              On 2 January 2020 the Vice President granted permission "in light of the interlocutor and note of the Lord Ordinary".

3.              Mr Govan, referring to the Note of Lord Brailsford, said that the FtT erred on the medical report; and that while the second error mentioned in the Note, on sur place activities, might not require the decision to be set aside, the first error did.

4.              The following outcome was agreed between the parties.

5.              The decision stands only as a record of what was said at the hearing.

6.              The nature of the case is such that it is appropriate under section 12 of the 2007 Act, and under Practice Statement 7.2, to remit to the FtT for an entirely fresh hearing.

7.              The member(s) of the FtT chosen to consider the case are not to include Judge Doyle.

8.              No anonymity direction has been requested or made.

 

 

27 February 2020

UT Judge Macleman

 

 

 


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2020/PA121952018.html