BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Immigration and Asylum (AIT/IAC) Unreported Judgments >> IA008932021 [2022] UKAITUR IA008932021 (21 June 2022) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKAITUR/2022/IA008932021.html Cite as: [2022] UKAITUR IA008932021, [2022] UKAITUR IA8932021 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
Asylum and Immigration tribunal-b&w-tiff
Upper Tribunal
(Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal: IA/00893/2021
UI-2022-000022
THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Heard at George House, Edinburgh |
Decision & Reasons Promulgated |
on 21 April 2022 |
on 21 June 2022 |
|
|
Before
UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE MACLEMAN
Between
THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT
Appellant
And
HENRIETTA ABENA SERWAAH BONSU
Respondent
For the Appellant: Mr P Deller, attending remotely, Senior Home Office Presenting Officer,
For the Respondent: Mr F Martey, attending remotely; Adukus, Solicitors
DETERMINATION AND REASONS
1. Permission was granted to appeal against the decision of FtT Judge Buckwell, references EA/50420/2020 and IA/00893/2021.
2. Mr Deller explained that the SSHD does not wish to proceed with her challenge, and invited the UT to dismiss the appeal.
3. The SSHD's appeal to the UT is dismissed. The decision of the FtT stands.
4. No anonymity direction has been requested or made.
H Macleman
22 April 2022
UT Judge Macleman
NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL RIGHTS
1. A person seeking permission to appeal against this decision must make a written application to the Upper Tribunal. Any such application must be received by the Upper Tribunal within the appropriate period after this decision was sent to the person making the application. The appropriate period varies, as follows, according to the location of the individual and the way in which the Upper Tribunal's decision was sent:
2. Where the person who appealed to the First-tier Tribunal is in the United Kingdom at the time that the application for permission to appeal is made, and is not in detention under the Immigration Acts, the appropriate period is 12 working days (10 working days, if the notice of decision is sent electronically).
3. Where the person making the application is in detention under the Immigration Acts , the appropriate period is 7 working days (5 working days, if the notice of decision is sent electronically).
4. Where the person who appealed to the First-tier Tribunal is outside the United Kingdom at the time that the application for permission to appeal is made, the appropriate period is 38 days (10 working days, if the notice of decision is sent electronically).
5. A "working day" means any day except a Saturday or a Sunday, Christmas Day, Good Friday or a bank holiday.
6. The date when the decision is "sent' is that appearing on the covering letter or covering email.