Thorpe v Milltrex Ltd & Anor [1993] UKEAT 665_92_1305 (13 May 1993)


BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Thorpe v Milltrex Ltd & Anor [1993] UKEAT 665_92_1305 (13 May 1993)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1993/665_92_1305.html
Cite as: [1993] UKEAT 665_92_1305

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


    BAILII case number: [1993] UKEAT 665_92_1305

    Appeal No. EAT/665/92

    I N T E R N A L

    EMPOLYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL

    58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS

    At the Tribunal

    On 13th May 1993

    Before

    THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE WOOD MC (P)

    MR P SMITH

    MRS M SUNDERLAND JP


    MR J THORPE          APPELLANT

    (1) MILLTREX LTD

    (2) CROWN CORP LTD          RESPONDENTS


    Transcript of Proceedings

    JUDGMENT

    PRELIMINARY HEARING

    Revised


     

    APPEARANCES

    For the Appellant NO ATTENDANCE BY

    APPELLANT


     

    MR JUSTICE WOOD (PRESIDENT): In this case the Applicant, Mr Thorpe, appealed against a decision of an Industrial Tribunal sitting at Manchester in March 1992.

    The Respondents were Milltrex Limited and Crown Corporation Limited, the issue was whether there was jurisdiction in that there had been a transfer of certain businesses and the question was whether two years continuous employment could be established. The Tribunal decided against him.

    Mr Thorpe appealed by a Notice of Appeal dated the 2nd June 1992. In the Notice of Appeal it was indicated that he had instructed solicitors to act for him and their name and address is given in the Notice of Appeal.

    We have made enquiries of the solicitors who do not know where Mr Thorpe is and are no longer acting for him. We have tried to contact Mr Thorpe through the usual provision by way of the Post Office and elsewhere and we are quite unable to make contact with him.

    In the circumstances, therefore, this appeal is dismissed.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1993/665_92_1305.html