BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Razzaq v Bestway Cash & Carry Ltd [1994] UKEAT 889_93_1504 (15 April 1994)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1994/889_93_1504.html
Cite as: [1994] UKEAT 889_93_1504

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


    BAILII case number: [1994] UKEAT 889_93_1504

    Appeal No. EAT/889/93

    I N T E R N A L

    EMPOLYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL

    58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS

    At the Tribunal

    On 15th April 1994

    Before

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE J HULL QC

    MR D O GLADWIN CBE JP

    MISS C HOLROYD


    MR I RAZZAQ          APPELLANT

    BESTWAY CASH & CARRY LTD          RESPONDENTS


    Transcript of Proceedings

    JUDGMENT

    PRELIMINARY HEARING

    Revised


     

    APPEARANCES

    For the Appellant No attendance or

    representation by or on behalf of the Appellant


     

    JUDGE J HULL QC: We have all considered the papers in this case. This is a preliminary hearing under our Practice Direction to see whether we can discover any point of law in the case because, of course, we can only entertain points of law on appeal. We have all considered the facts and the decision of the Industrial Tribunal. We do not need to go into the details, but the Tribunal held unanimously that the employers had a reasonable belief which justified their dismissal of the Applicant and the majority of the Tribunal held in addition that the employer had carried out a reasonable and proper investigation and had acted fairly in arriving at its belief. We can find nothing in the decision to show any error of law, in particular there is nothing to show that the decision was in the legal sense unreasonable or perverse. The Tribunal appears to us to have applied the correct tests and heard all the evidence.

    In those circumstances, we can discover no point of law and this appeal cannot proceed and we dismiss the appeal.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1994/889_93_1504.html