BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Morgan v Blaenau Gwent Borough Council [1996] UKEAT 944_95_1901 (19 January 1996)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1996/944_95_1901.html
Cite as: [1996] UKEAT 944_95_1901

[New search] [Help]


    BAILII case number: [1996] UKEAT 944_95_1901

    Appeal No. EAT/944/95

    EMPOLYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL

    58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS

    At the Tribunal

    On 19th January 1996

    HIS HONOUR JUDGE C SMITH Q.C.

    MR L D COWAN

    MRS T A MARSLAND


    MR P D MORGAN          APPELLANT

    BLAENAU GWENT BOROUGH COUNCIL          RESPONDENTS


    Transcript of Proceedings

    JUDGMENT

    PRELIMINARY HEARING

    Revised


     

    APPEARANCES

    For the Appellant MR P D MORGAN

    (Appellant in Person)

    For the Respondents


     

    JUDGE SMITH Q.C.: This is an appeal from decision of an Industrial Tribunal Chairman refusing an extension of time in which to apply for the extended reasons of the Tribunal's decision. The original Tribunal's decision was given in May 1994 and the application for extended reasons was not made until eleven months later and was refused in the terms set out in the Chairman's letter of 13th July 1995 on the grounds that the request had only been made eleven months after the Tribunal's decision with summary reasons, whereas it should have been made within 21 days of the date upon which the Appellant was sent the summary reasons, namely 9th June 1994.

    In our judgment this was a proper reason for refusing to extend the time permitted and we must uphold the Chairman's decision to refuse the request to provide extended reasons after such a long delay. Accordingly on that issue the appeal must be dismissed.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1996/944_95_1901.html