BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
 |
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | |
United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal |
||
|
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Wright v British Telecom Plc [1996] UKEAT 961_95_2601 (26 January 1996) URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1996/961_95_2601.html Cite as: [1996] UKEAT 961_95_2601 |
||
[New search] [Help]
At the Tribunal
HIS HONOUR JUDGE J ALTMAN
MR R TODD
MISS A MACKIE OBE
JUDGMENT
PRELIMINARY HEARING
Revised
APPEARANCES
For the Appellant IN PERSON
JUDGE ALTMAN: This matter comes before us by way of preliminary hearing in the appeal of the Applicant from the decision of the Industrial Tribunal sitting at Leicester on 7 April, 22, 23 and 24 May and 3 July 1995.
The hearing today is to give the Applicant the opportunity to show cause as to the point of law that exists in his appeal, so as to warrant this matter being considered by the full Appeal Tribunal. His arguments are set out in the Notice of Appeal. We have considered his arguments and are satisfied that those procedural matters to which reference is made in the Notice of Appeal, raises points of law which do merit further argument at a full hearing.
Accordingly we direct as follows. That this matter will be listed for full hearing for a day before the Employment Appeal Tribunal at such date as is subsequently directed. Secondly, skeleton arguments will be filed within six weeks of the date on which this judgment is sealed. Thirdly, the Respondents will provide within six weeks of the date upon which this judgment is sealed, all such documents as were referred to in the order of the Industrial Tribunal of 6 April 1995 and remained not produced at the hearing so as to be referred to in paragraph 6 of the final decision of the Industrial Tribunal. Fourthly, the Chairman will be asked to furnish copies of his notes of evidence confined to any evidence relating to the production or non-production of documents in accordance with the order referred to and referred to in paragraph 6 of the decision, together with any notes he may have of any submissions or discussions which took place during the hearing relating to those documents.
Subject to that, the Chairman's notes of evidence will be dispensed with. That order will be drawn and sent in due course. This matter will go to a full hearing.
