BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Matthews v Dickinson & Anor [1997] UKEAT 140_95_1107 (11 July 1997)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1997/140_95_1107.html
Cite as: [1997] UKEAT 140_95_1107

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1997] UKEAT 140_95_1107
Appeal No. EAT/140/95

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 11 July 1997

Before

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MORISON (PRESIDENT)

MR R JACKSON

MR B M WARMAN



MRS P MATTHEWS APPELLANT

(1) R DICKINSON
(2) PRESTON CENTRAL CONSERVATIVE CLUB
RESPONDENTS


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

FOR DISPOSAL

© Copyright 1997


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant NO APPEARANCE BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE APPELLANT
    For the Respondents NO APPEARANCE BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS


     

    MR JUSTICE MORISON (PRESIDENT): Nobody has turned up for this appeal which has been listed for disposal.

    It has become apparent from correspondence passing between Messrs Marsden Huck, solicitors for the appellant, and the Employment Appeal Tribunal, that Legal Aid had been removed from the appellant in this case. As a result of which they were no longer instructed in the matter and had no knowledge or instructions from their former client. The matter, therefore, has not been progressed for some time.

    We have tried to contact the appellant but without success.

    Accordingly, this is an appeal which is stale. We had given leave on 5th October 1995 for it to proceed to a full hearing. But as I say, nothing has happened. Accordingly, the right order is that the appeal should be dismissed.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1997/140_95_1107.html