BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> Cash v. Ministry of Defence (Navy) [1999] UKEAT 422_99_2107 (21 July 1999)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/422_99_2107.html
Cite as: [1999] UKEAT 422_99_2107

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [1999] UKEAT 422_99_2107
Appeal No. EAT/422/99

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 21 July 1999

Before

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE CHARLES

MR S M SPRINGER MBE

MRS R A VICKERS



MISS L CASH APPELLANT

MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (NAVY) RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 1999


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant IN PERSON
       


     

    MR JUSTICE CHARLES: This case comes before us pursuant to the preliminary hearing procedure under which it is for the Appellant to show that she has a reasonably arguable case. She appeals against a decision of the Employment Tribunal which was sent to the parties on 5 February 1999.

  1. Those Extended Reasons record that the conclusion of the Employment Tribunal was that they did not have jurisdiction to hear the complaints made by Miss Cash against the Ministry of Defence. In those Extended Reasons they go through the relevant statutory provisions relating to the jurisdiction of the Employment Tribunal. In our judgment they have identified the correct statutory provisions and their conclusions are plainly right.
  2. It follows that, notwithstanding that Miss Cash maintains that she has justifiable complaints against the conduct of the Ministry of Defence, the Employment Tribunal had, and has, no jurisdiction to hear the complaints specified in the Extended Reasons which they refused to hear. It also follows (a) that this appeal raises no point of law that is reasonably arguable, and therefore (b) that we have no jurisdiction to hear it and it must be dismissed.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/1999/422_99_2107.html