BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Appeal Tribunal >> McGurran v. Co-Operative Wholesale Society Ltd (t/a North Eastern Co-Op) [2000] UKEAT 395_00_0407 (4 July 2000)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/395_00_0407.html
Cite as: [2000] UKEAT 395__407, [2000] UKEAT 395_00_0407

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


BAILII case number: [2000] UKEAT 395_00_0407
Appeal No. EAT/395/00

EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL
58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
             At the Tribunal
             On 4 July 2000

Before

HIS HONOUR JUDGE DAVID WILCOX

MRS A GALLICO

LORD GLADWIN OF CLEE CBE JP



MR W J MCGURRAN APPELLANT

CO-OPERATIVE WHOLESALE SOCIETY LTD
T/A NORTH EASTERN CO-OP
RESPONDENT


Transcript of Proceedings

JUDGMENT

PRELIMINARY HEARING

© Copyright 2000


    APPEARANCES

     

    For the Appellant MR D STILITZ
    (of Counsel)
    Instructed by:
    Anthoney T Bryson & Co
    5/7/9 Grey Street
    Newcastle upon Tyne
    NE1 6EE
       


     

    JUDGE WILCOX:

  1. A Chairman of an Employment Tribunal sitting alone on 11 February 2000 refused the Appellant leave to amend his originating application to include claims in respect of disability discrimination and unauthorised deduction from wages. Two points arise:
  2. 1. The question of jurisdiction. The Chairman was sitting alone. He was from outside the normal area region and none the less when the Regional Chairman had given his original directions, he directed that the matter required determination by a full Tribunal from a panel without the area. Firstly, we think it is arguable that there is a jurisdiction point here.

    2. Insofar as the decision was concerned it was quite clear that the Chairman who elected to give a decision in the absence of a full panel or full Tribunal, corrected applied the law, exemplified in the Housing Corporation ground. It is in the application of it that there is criticism made. We think, that it is a valid criticism, in so far as when we go to the originating application, it is clear that expressly there were raised matters that, on a common sense reading of them, would lead to a conclusion that matters of disability and discrimination were in fact being raised. We think that although the learned chairman enlighted on the correct law, it is evident or may be evident, if argued before a full Tribunal that he erred in that application.

  3. We give leave on those two grounds therefore for the matter to go to a full Tribunal. Category C ½ a day.


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKEAT/2000/395_00_0407.html